Transfer of authority to EU agencies violates the Constitution and the EEA Agreement

Statement from the No to EU Congress 2018: The EU is expanding based on expert leverage and complex procedures in order to circumvent the rule of law and national control mechanisms.

Ever larger sectors of society are affected by the EU – directly and indirectly. Gradually, decisions are removed from open, democratic arenas and confined to closed rooms. Every transfer of jurisdiction Norway accepts is a violation of our democratic tradition and of our sovereignty, and adds up to an attack on democracy and the rule of law.

When the EEA Agreement was concluded, it was a prerequisite that the agreement should be international law and not supranational like an EU membership. EFTA countries, such as Norway and Iceland, and the EU were to be two separate "pillars". Separate institutions were set up to enforce the EEA Agreement in the EFTA States; the ESA Surveillance Authority and the EFTA Court. Norway would not be subject to EU institutions.

Decision-making authority has been transferred, either formally or effectively, from Norwegian authorities to EU agencies where Norway neither is entitled to vote, nor is or may become a full member.

This two-pillar system has been under pressure and has in several cases collapsed in recent years. Decision-making authority has been transferred, either formally or effectively, from Norwegian authorities to EU agencies where Norway neither is entitled to vote, nor is or may become a full member.

In the disputed ACER case (part of the 3rd Energy Market Package, translator's note), the ESA Surveillance Authority will formally make the decisions, but the resolutions are written by the Energy Agency ACER in Ljubljana. ESA's decision then passes through the Norwegian Regulatory Authority for Energy (RME), which, according to the EU regulations, must be independent of national authorities. RME shall copy and implement the decisions of ESA and may not be instructed by government or parliament. In other words, a chain of copied command from the EU agency. and decisions are made binding on affected subjects in Norway.

The EU has built up a comprehensive management system, also beyond the European Commission in Brussels. The around forty EU agencies cover areas such as finance, environment, transport, defence and justice. Some of them, like the Environment Agency in Copenhagen, handle information and advice, but more and more agencies have supreme decision-making authority.

Norway is associated with most EU agencies. The Chemicals Agency in Helsinki, for example, decides which chemicals can be used in Norway, and the Air Safety Agency in Cologne can issue compulsory instructions to Norwegian airlines. Through replica ruling of the ESA, the EU Financial Supervisory Authority may take decisions regulating Norwegian banks, pension funds and other financial institutions and override the Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority.

No to the EU insists that our government and parliament cease all further bindings to EU agencies. The overall impact of the transfer of authority on Norwegian sovereignty and the EEA Agreement system, must be examined in an Official Report (a White Paper).

Section 115 of our Constitution does not allow the transfer of authority to an institution of which Norway is not a member. No to the EU therefore demands that the Government and the parliament comply with this.

reLATERT

Se alle arrangementer

Et varig krafttak

15. aug. 2022

Regjeringen kan med ett grep ta styring i strømdebatten og utlade Høyre.

Standpunkt 2-2022

22. juni 2022

I dette nummeret kan du lese om utsiktene til ny EU-debatt i Norge, og om ny meningsmåling som viser at bare 1 av 4 støtter EØS.

Hold EUs sikkerhetspolitikk unna EØS-avtalen!

21. juni 2022

Den utenrikspolitiske situasjonen og krigen i Ukraina blir forsøkt utnyttet til å innrullere Norge i EUs militærunion.

EU-regler for dyr og mat: EØS-avtalen plager oss

09. juni 2022

Mer bruk av antibiotika og kasting av gode egg kan bli resultatet av nye mat- og dyreregler på veg fra EU.

Bare 1 av 4 støtter EØS

03. juni 2022

En fersk meningsmåling viser at det er flere som støtter en handelsavtale med EU enn EØS-avtalen.

LO-sekretariatet: «Tiltres ikke»

25. mai 2022

LO-kongressen kan i verste fall ende opp med å stille enda vagere krav enn dem som regjeringspartiene har forplikta seg til i Hurdalsplattformen.

EØS-unntak på en, to, tre

23. mai 2022

På visse områder har styresmaktene ingen problemer med å anbefale at Norge benytter seg av unntaksmulighetene i EØS-avtalen.

Tommel opp for toget

23. mai 2022

Det er opp til LO-kongressen å parkere konkurranseutsettingen av jernbanen.

Krafttak på kongressen 

18. mai 2022

LO-kongressen kan brukes til å berge strømprisene – og regjeringsprosjektet. 

Nær 600 nye medlemmer hittil i år

05. mai 2022

Siden nyttår har Nei til EU fått nær 600 nye medlemmer, og bare de to siste ukene har vi registrert så mye som 200 nye medlemmer.

1. mai er vår kamp- og festdag 

01. mai 2022

Russlands angrep på Ukraina kaster mørker skygger innover den internasjonale kamp- og festdagen 1. mai. Europa har nok krigsminnesmerker. Krigen må derfor stoppes og russiske styrker trekkes ut. 

Nytt styre i Møre og Romsdal Nei til EU

11. april 2022

Jan David Anti er valgt til ny leder i Møre og Romsdal Nei til EU. Han er bygningsarbeider, opprinnelig fra Karasjok, men nå bosatt i Kristiansund.