Transfer of authority to EU agencies violates the Constitution and the EEA Agreement

Statement from the No to EU Congress 2018: The EU is expanding based on expert leverage and complex procedures in order to circumvent the rule of law and national control mechanisms.

Ever larger sectors of society are affected by the EU – directly and indirectly. Gradually, decisions are removed from open, democratic arenas and confined to closed rooms. Every transfer of jurisdiction Norway accepts is a violation of our democratic tradition and of our sovereignty, and adds up to an attack on democracy and the rule of law.

When the EEA Agreement was concluded, it was a prerequisite that the agreement should be international law and not supranational like an EU membership. EFTA countries, such as Norway and Iceland, and the EU were to be two separate "pillars". Separate institutions were set up to enforce the EEA Agreement in the EFTA States; the ESA Surveillance Authority and the EFTA Court. Norway would not be subject to EU institutions.

Decision-making authority has been transferred, either formally or effectively, from Norwegian authorities to EU agencies where Norway neither is entitled to vote, nor is or may become a full member.

This two-pillar system has been under pressure and has in several cases collapsed in recent years. Decision-making authority has been transferred, either formally or effectively, from Norwegian authorities to EU agencies where Norway neither is entitled to vote, nor is or may become a full member.

In the disputed ACER case (part of the 3rd Energy Market Package, translator's note), the ESA Surveillance Authority will formally make the decisions, but the resolutions are written by the Energy Agency ACER in Ljubljana. ESA's decision then passes through the Norwegian Regulatory Authority for Energy (RME), which, according to the EU regulations, must be independent of national authorities. RME shall copy and implement the decisions of ESA and may not be instructed by government or parliament. In other words, a chain of copied command from the EU agency. and decisions are made binding on affected subjects in Norway.

The EU has built up a comprehensive management system, also beyond the European Commission in Brussels. The around forty EU agencies cover areas such as finance, environment, transport, defence and justice. Some of them, like the Environment Agency in Copenhagen, handle information and advice, but more and more agencies have supreme decision-making authority.

Norway is associated with most EU agencies. The Chemicals Agency in Helsinki, for example, decides which chemicals can be used in Norway, and the Air Safety Agency in Cologne can issue compulsory instructions to Norwegian airlines. Through replica ruling of the ESA, the EU Financial Supervisory Authority may take decisions regulating Norwegian banks, pension funds and other financial institutions and override the Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority.

No to the EU insists that our government and parliament cease all further bindings to EU agencies. The overall impact of the transfer of authority on Norwegian sovereignty and the EEA Agreement system, must be examined in an Official Report (a White Paper).

Section 115 of our Constitution does not allow the transfer of authority to an institution of which Norway is not a member. No to the EU therefore demands that the Government and the parliament comply with this.

reLATERT

Se alle arrangementer

Om å flytte gjerder

12. april 2021

Refleksjoner etter Høyesteretts dom om nasjonal myndighetsavståelse.

Høyesterett stiller seg bak en høyst usikker forståelse av EUs jernbanepakke

09. april 2021

Høyesterett legger den utøvende makts vurdering til grunn om EUs fjerde jernbanepakke.

Tåken har klarnet i kanalen

29. mars 2021

Tre lærdommer fra britenes tre måneder utenfor EUs indre marked.

Spenner Norge fast i EUs sikkerhetsbelte

26. mars 2021

I verdensbildet til regjeringa er EU svaret på alt, også når det gjelder å sikre vår trygghet og frihet. Selv når EU krenker folkeretten og havretten, og dermed vitale norske interesser.

Taxinæring på felgen

23. mars 2021

Den nye EU-tilpassede Yrkestransportloven har punktert drosjenæringa slik vi kjenner den.

Høgsteretts vedtak om ACER — eit vendepunkt i EØS-striden

22. mars 2021

Høgsterett har vedtatt at Nei til EU har høve til å føra sak mot regjeringa for brot på Grunnloven. Stortinget følgde ikkje Grunnlovens § 115 då dei vedtok EUs energipakke 3 og la Norge under EUs energibyrå ACER.

Råtne sviller under jernbanesporet

19. mars 2021

Striden rundt EUs fjerde jernbanepakke bør bli en valgkampsak, uansett hva Høyesterett konkluderer med i sin vurdering av behandlingsmåten i Stortinget.

EØS-guiden

17. mars 2021

EØS-avtalens innhold, konsekvenser og alternativer

Fortsatt kabotasje med EUs mobilitetspakker

16. mars 2021

Situasjonen for vogntog er ille med sosial dumping og svekket trafikksikkerhet. I turbussbransjen er den håpløs. Hvordan virker EUs nye mobilitetspakker i denne virkeligheten?

Luftig boikott kan få hard landing

12. mars 2021

Som et EØS-registrert selskap kan Wizz Air fritt etablere seg i Norge. Det er ikke krav om en fast mannskapsbase i Norge, heller ikke for å føre priskrig på norske innenlandske flyruter. Men det kan finnes en nødutgang for å sikre arbeidsvilkårene i lufta.

Hydros salg av valseverk og EØS-avtalen.

10. mars 2021

EØS-avtalen hindrer ikke bruk av eiermakt. Departementet kan når som helst stanse salget.

Vett 1 2021: Hvilken transport trenger vi?

09. mars 2021

Nytt hefte om EUs fjerde jernbanepakke, Wizz Air, Uber og kabotasjekjøring.